In After Fukushima Jean-Luc Nancy examines the nature of the Fukushima nuclear disaster through what he terms “the equivalence of catastrophes” which involves “the complexity of interdependent systems (ecological or economic, sociopolitico-ideologic, technoscientific, cultural, logical, etc.).” Thinking that this “equivalence of catastrophes” is closely connected with “finality itself – aiming, planning, and projecting a future in general,” he asserts that without emerging from the finality itself, we will not be able to turn away from “the equivalence of catastrophes.” He understands Fukushima as a demand for us to emerge from “finality itself” and “work with other futures,” that is to say, to “open other paths.” What does it mean to emerge from “finality itself” and “work with other futures”? The analysis of Samuel Beckett’s post-apocalyptic play, Endgame is helpful in thinking of this question. Endgame presents us with a vision of the world after a catastrophic disaster of sorts. It is set in a room with two small windows, looking out onto a grey, lifeless world where all is gone. Not only the characters on the stage but also the audience are exposed to the spatiotemporal dimension of “after.” In this paper, focusing on this dimension of “after,” I try to explore how this play indicates the possibility of finding a way out of the impasse of human existence. I will examine this in light of Nancy’s observation in After Fukushima (especially his understanding of “after” in “after Fukushima” as rupture or suspense) and The Inoperative Community.
Michiko Tsushima, University of Tsukuba, Japan
Stream: Literary Studies / All genres/ Theory
This paper is part of the ACCS2019 Conference Proceedings (View)
View / Download the full paper in a new tab/window
Comments & FeedbackPlace a comment using your LinkedIn profile
Share this Research